Ender A, Mehl A.
Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions–an in-vitro study.
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2011;14(1):11-21.
The digital intraoral impression has become a central part of the CAD/CAM technique. The objective of the present study was to compare the accuracy
) of digital impressions of the full arch with that of conventional impressions on the in-vitro model. For this purpose, a master model was acquired with a new reference scanning process, the measuring trueness
of which was +/- 4.1 microm and the precision
+/- 2.5 microm. On the one hand, conventional impressions and then plaster models (n = 5) were produced from this master model, and on the other hand, digital impressions were made with the Cerec AC Bluecam and the Lava COS system (each n = 5). The plaster models were also scanned with the reference scanner
. The available data records were superimposed and the differences determined. The deviation from the master model defines the trueness
of the impression method. The deviations of the models among one another demonstrate the precision
of the method. The trueness
of the impressions was 55 +/- 21.8 microm in the conventional impression group
, for digital impressions with Cerec Bluecam it was 49 +/- 14.2 microm and for digital impressions with Lava COS 40.3 +/- 14.1 microm. The precision
was 61.3 +/- 17.9 microm for conventional impression with Impregum, 30.9 +/- 7.1 microm for digital impression
with the Cerec Bluecam and 60.1 +/- 31.3 microm for digital impression
with Lava COS. These in-vitro results show that accuracy
of the digital impression
is similar to that of the conventional impression. These results will have to be confirmed in further clinical studies.